Smartyfair
Time is not an empirical conception. For neither coexistence nor succession would be perceived by us, if the representation of time did not exist as a foundation à priori. Without this presupposition we could not represent to ourselves that things exist together at one and the same time, or at different times, that is, contemporaneously, or in succession.

Where these words come from

How sure this is
95% sureThese words were traced back to where they first appeared. That source is listed below.
What turned up
Critique of Pure Reason (1781/1787), J. M. D. Meiklejohn translation (1855), Transcendental Aesthetic; Exact wording and attribution checked. Philosophical argument that time is a form of human intuition, not a modern physics claim.
Work
Critique of Pure Reason (1781/1787), J. M. D. Meiklejohn translation (1855), Transcendental Aesthetic
Sources checked
  • gutenberg.orgChecked using manual, 21 October 2026Critique of Pure Reason (1781/1787), J. M. D. Meiklejohn translation (1855), Transcendental Aesthetic; Exact wording and attribution checked. Philosophical argument that time is a form of human intuition, not a modern physics claim.

Nothing made from these words yet — Storyfaire is where they get made.

More from Immanuel Kant

See all

More inspiration

See all

Leave without saving?

You have a change that hasn’t been saved yet. Clicking out of the box saves it — closing now throws that change away.